| |
| | [No title] |
 | | In this regard, Hess testified that subsequent to the purchase of the Florence facility, Respondent installed equipment valued at approximately $350,000 in the Florence plant to enable it to paint, decorate, and conduct final inspection of its beverage and bakery trailers and trucks at the Florence location. |
| | Hess explained that some of the equipment, including paintbooths, was moved from the Carlstadt plant to Florence, while other needed equipment was purchased.6 The record reveals the painting, decoration, and inspection functions continued to be performed at the Carlstadt plant until the equipment installation was completed at Florence near the end of January 1987. |
| | Although new functions were performed at the Florence plant once beverage trucks and trailers were sent there for painting, decoration, and inspection, the record fails to reveal that a significant number of Carlstadt employees were trans- ferred to the Florence plant to accomplish those tasks. |
| www.nlrb.gov /nlrb/shared_files/decisions/295/295-1013.txt (4974 words) |
|
