| |
| | Caballero Delgado and Santana: A Problematic Application of the American Convention |
 | | According to a 1992 report issued by Human Rights Watch/Americas, forced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial executions, and arbitrary detentions were common in many regions of the country, and were particularly related to the repression of suspected guerrilla members, political dissidents, union leaders, human rights activists and civilians caught in conflict zones. |
 | | The Court, however, declared that the forced disappearance of the two people did not imply the violation of Article 5 (right not to be tortured) or of Articles 25 and 8 (the right to judicial protection and to fair trial). |
 | | In keeping with these standards, the Court has stated that, in cases of forced disappearances, habeas corpus (as understood in Latin American legal systems) is the appropriate remedy to establish the whereabouts of the victims, to ascertain the legality of their deprivation of liberty, and, when the detention is unlawful, to order their release. |
| www.wcl.american.edu /hrbrief/v3i3/caball33.htm (2300 words) |
|