
	Where results make sense

Topic: Free Art license

Related Topics

Solresol

Bela Balazs

Malcolm Chisholm

China Policy Institute

Saint Etienne (band)

William Haines

Wladyslaw Raczkiewicz

History of cryptography

Cookeville, Tennessee

Burramyidae

Cumberlandite

In the News (Sun 27 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Free Art License v1.1
		With this Free Art License, you are authorised to copy, distribute and freely transform the work of art while respecting the rights of the originator.
		Thus, the object(ive) of art is not equivalent to the finished and defined art object.
		He is the authors and artists of an original art object resulting from the modification of a copy of the initial oeuvre or the modification of a copy of a subsequent work of art.
	www.myope.com /copyleft/lal_eng.html (1496 words)

	[No title]
		Free Art license version 1.1 Preamble: With this Free Art License, you are authorised to copy, distribute and freely transform the work of art while respecting the rights of the originator.
		He is the creator of an original art object resulting from the modification of a copy of the initial oeuvre or the modification of a copy of a subsequent work of art.
		This license has a history: it was born at the meeting "Copyleft Attitude" http://copyleft.tsx.org which took place at "Accès Local" and "Public" in Paris at the beginning of the year 2000.
	adele.gerwinski.de /~anja/gnuart/europa-and-gnu/LICENCE (1461 words)

	[No title]
		Free Art license version 1.1 Preamble: With this Free Art License, you are authorised to copy, distribute and freely transform the work of art while respecting the rights of the originator.
		He is the creator of an original art object resulting from the modification of a copy of the initial oeuvre or the modification of a copy of a subsequent work of art.
		This license has a history: it was born at the meeting "Copyleft Attitude" http://copyleft.tsx.org which took place at "Accès Local" and "Public" in Paris at the beginning of the year 2000.
	ngc224.gerwinski.de /~anja/gnuart/europa-and-gnu/LICENCE (1461 words)

	¨Prison soup ¨Records : Free Art license [ Copyleft Attitude ] version 1.1
		With this Free Art License, you are authorised to copy, distribute and freely transform the work of art while respecting the rights of the originator.
		He is the author or the artist of an original art object resulting from the modification of a copy of the initial oeuvre or the modification of a copy of a subsequent work of art.
		This license has a history: it was born at the meeting " Copyleft Attitude " http://artlibre.org which took place at "Accès Local" and "Public" in Paris at the beginning of the year 2000.
	prisonsoup.com /free-art-license-copyleft-attitude-version-1.1_a9.html (1542 words)

	Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)
		The primary incompatibility is that this Python license is governed by the laws of the "State of Virginia", in the USA, and the GPL does not permit this.
		This is a Free Documentation license that is incompatible with the GNU FDL.
		Likewise, if you use this license without either of the options to make your manual free, someone else might decide to imitate you, then change his or her mind about the options thinking that that is just a detail; the result would be that his or her manual is non-free.
	www.gnu.org /licenses/license-list.html (6201 words)

	Free Art license - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		The Free Art license is the English language version of the License Art Libre, a French copyleft license for works of art.
		It represents an attempt to craft a Free license in the spirit of the GNU General Public License adapted for work of art.
		All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (see Copyrights for details).
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Free_Art_license (79 words)

	Artlibre.org: Free Art License
		He is the author or the artist of an original art object resulting from the modification of a copy of the initial artwork or the modification of a copy of a subsequent work of art.
		All the elements of this work of art must remain free, which is why you are not allowed to integrate the originals (originals and subsequents) into another work which would not be subject to this license.
		This license has a history: it was born at the meeting " Copyleft Attitude " which took place at "Accès Local" and "Public" in Paris at the beginning of the year 2000.
	artlibre.org /licence/lal/en (1621 words)

	Piet Zwart Institute - Chapter 5
		The Free Art License imposes this restriction not to deny any person his contribution or authorial rights but by choosing to contribute to the evolution of this work of art, the licensee/ user agrees to give to others the same rights which were also granted to the licensee.
		A documentation license brought out by Apple for software documentation, instructional manuals etc. It seeks to be a much neater and simpler license than the GNU Free Documentation License by avoiding a number of the elaborate technical details of publishing which are required there.
		The primary reason for the absence of clarity is a clause in the license (Clause 6) which allows a person to impose certain licensing options, or restrictions, which alters the nature of the license and transforms it from being a free license to a relatively non free license.
	pzwart.wdka.hro.nl /mdr/research/lliang/open_content_guide/06-chapter_5/view (6687 words)

	What Is Free Art License? By Lawrence Liang \| Design & People
		The license allows artist/creators to make their works available freely to the public, and grants them the right to copy, distribute and modify the work if certain conditions are met.
		The license is also designed to enable the public to creative use of artworks, therefore reinforcing the idea of the user/producer model of the internet and other digital media.
		The Free Art License imposes this restriction not to deny any person his or his contribution or authorial rights but to ensure that in choosing to contribute to the evolution of this work of art, the license/user agrees to give to others the same rights which were also granted to the license.
	www.designandpeople.org /downloads/free_art_license.html (1061 words)

	Category:Art - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Art is a broad term, which may be interpreted in different ways, often relating to creativity, aesthetics and generation of emotion.
		See the overview articles about Art, Arts and Fine art.
		The term art is often used to mean only visual art, but it can also refer to all arts.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Category:Art (113 words)

	Free Art License
		With this Free Art license, you are given the right to freely copy, distribute and transform the artworks in the respect of the rights of the author.
		Thus, the object of art is not equivalent to the artistic object, finite and defined as such.
		All the elements of this artwork must remain free, this is why you are not allowed to integrate the originals in another work which would not be subject to this license.
	www.constantvzw.com /copy.cult/texts/lal_en.html (1612 words)

	Free Art License
		This license has a history: it was born at the meeting " Copyleft Attitude " http://artlibre.org which took place at "Accès Local" and "Public" in Paris at the beginning of the year 2000.
		Avec cette Licence Art Libre, l'autorisation est donnée de copier, de diffuser et de transformer librement les oeuvres dans le respect des droits de l'auteur.
		La Licence Art Libre offre un cadre juridique intéressant pour empêcher toute appropriation abusive.
	www.vilt.net /nkdee/fal.htm (3407 words)

	EFF Suggested Alternatives to the Open Audio License (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		The linart project, whose purpose is to define, encourage, and promote free art and a community of those who make it.
		The Design Science License, a copyleft license which ensures that the attribution integrity of a work is kept.
		The GNU General Public License, though generally used for software, this very popular copyleft license can be easily adapted for use with just about any copyrightable medium.
	www.eff.org /IP/Open_licenses/open_alternatives.html (224 words)

	License - Art of Illusion
		By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users.
		For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.
		Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice.
	aoi.sourceforge.net /license (2086 words)

	FSF - Licenses
		If you want help choosing a license, evaluating a license, or have any other questions about licenses, you can email us at .
		If you want to use a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license, it is much better to use the modified BSD license or the X11 license.
		This is a free software license which is not a strong copyleft; it has some complex restrictions that make it incompatible with the GNU GPL.
	www.fsf.org /licensing/licenses/index_html (6044 words)

	CopyCultGlossary - questions: free art licences (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		Why the success of the Creative Commons now?(this question could be rephrased as "what are the differences between the Free Art License and CC", or as "are CC free(enough)?") Is it because...
		Most of the free licenses for art are inspired by the Copyleft and especially by the GPL.
		Contemporary artists are born in the framework of author's rights.(one could argue that leaving author's rights would be a return to a previous stage of art history: Middle Age, Renaissance produced major art works without copyrights).
	www.stormy-weather.be /free_art.php (659 words)

	GNU Free Documentation License - Art History Online Reference and Guide
		The current state of the license is version 1.2, the official text of which can be found at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html.
		While the Document itself is wholly editable, and is essentially covered by a license equivalent to (but both-ways incompatible with) the GNU General Public License, some of the secondary sections have various restrictions designed primarily to deal with proper attribution to previous authors.
		Specifically, the authors of prior versions have to be acknowledged and certain "invariant sections" specified by the original author and dealing with his or her relationship to the subject matter may not be changed.
	www.arthistoryclub.com /art_history/GFDL (940 words)

	The Free Art License (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		We tried to include all GPL related licenses to cover artwork but if there is a suitable one we are unaware of, we will of course consider permitting it.
		The Free Art License seems to be the most suited for this king of artwork, since it's an adapted GPL for Arts : free and copyleft.
		The problem with the use of the word "creator" in the license is due to a bad translation, it should be fixed soon.
	dot.kde.org /1048968963/1049024395 (839 words)

	References - Open Content Explained (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		Free Culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity.
		Free Culture: How big media used technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity, by Lawrence Lessig.
		All of these photos were licensed with "attribution" being the only restriction.
	www.slais.ubc.ca /courses/libr500/04-05-wt1/www/W_Huot/references.htm (255 words)

	Licenses
		Documentation for free software should be free documentation, so that people can redistribute it and improve it along with the software it describes.
		This license was formerly called the Library GPL, but we changed the name, because the old name encouraged people to use this license more often than it really ought to be used.
		The GNU Free Documentation License is a form of copyleft intended for use on a manual, textbook or other document to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifications, either commercially or noncommercially.
	www.gnu.org /licenses/licenses.html (1390 words)

	Licenses (on ComputerFizz.com) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		Service allowing quick and easy selection of one of a range of Open Content licenses to meet a content creators' requirements (concerning attribution, whether commercial use is allowed, and whether modification is allowed).
		The purpose of this License is to make a rulebook, game manual, sourcebook, supplement, or other written role-playing game document "free" in the sense that everyone is permitted to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially.
		License of the Open Gaming Foundation, as drafted by Wizards of the Coast.
	www.computerfizz.com /Open_Source/Open_Content/Licenses (175 words)

	Computers Open Source Open Content Licenses (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		Creative Commons License Generator - Service allowing quick and easy selection of one of a range of Open Content licenses to meet a content creators' requirements (concerning attribution, whether commercial use is allowed, and whether modification is allowed).
		Free Art License - Copyleft license applied to artistic content and projects.
		GNU Free Documentation License - A version of the GPL for reference material.
	www.dmoz.org.pl /Computers/Open_Source/Open_Content/Licenses (177 words)

	Re: Free Art License
		* Francesco Poli [12/09/04, 11:42:42]: > Switching from the GPL to a GPL-incompatible license would probably > cause major problems to any other GPL-compatible work that would like to > reuse your work (in any way that creates a derivative work).
		> Creating barriers across the free software world is not a good practice > -- at least, not one I would recommend...
		I totally agree here, but for problems I'll address later GPL doesn't really cut it for artwork, at least a lot of people I'm talking to think so.
	lists.debian.org /debian-legal/2004/09/msg00178.html (297 words)

	Battle for Wesnoth :: View topic - BfW art license
		INAL; The orginal artist holds the copyright and released his/her art under the GPL we can't relicence it without the approval of the orginal artist.
		Also note all art which has been released under the GPL will always be available under the GPL, you can't retroactive relicence things (unless you're part of the gouverment of course).
		Trying to change the license for all graphics in wesnoth would be nearly impossible and having parts of the graphics under a different license than others would be a pain to manage.
	www.wesnoth.org /forum/viewtopic.php?t=14337 (532 words)

	robmyers » Not Another License (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		The Open Art License, by the Open Art Network.
		If people want a GPL-style license for art, one that requires that sources be provided, they should probably just use the GPL.
		The Free Art License has been out for a while now, and I drafted (but fortunately never used) a BSD-style art license a few years back.
	www.robmyers.org /weblog/2004/12/10/not-another-license (121 words)

	Free 2D 3D Software Design Art: 3d software downloads online
		Blender therefore is fully free to use and distribute within any educational, professional or commercial environment.
		Most of the presented 2D art and 3D design software is totality free for non commercial usage.
		Visitors are allowed to download art works for personal use free of charge.
	freeartsoftware.com /free-software-downloads/page02art3dfreeware.htm (1539 words)

	Quietsiren > Free Art Portfolio (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		Here it is: a collection of my original graphics sets, free for use on personal web sites in exchange for a link back to Quietsiren.
		Commercial web site owners must pay a license fee before using any of the Free Art sets.
		And anyone can buy one of the sets outright (for a one-time charge, of course), at which time I'll remove it from the Free Art Portfolio.
	www.quietsiren.com /freeart.shtml (159 words)

	Artlibre.org: Bienvenue
		Avec la Licence Art Libre, l'autorisation est donnée de copier, de diffuser et de transformer librement les oeuvres dans le respect des droits de l'auteur.
		Loin d'ignorer ces droits, la Licence Art Libre les reconnaît et les protège.
		La Licence Art Libre permet d'avoir jouissance des oeuvres tout en reconnaissant les droits et les responsabilités de chacun.
	www.artlibre.org (220 words)

	Open Cultures: 5.copyright Archives (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
		For instance, the radical 'free radio' stations created by New Left militants in France and Italy refused all funding from state and commercial sources.
		The free circulation of information between users relies upon the capitalist production of computers, software and telecommunications.
		Today the source code of this program is freely available and the development of products for Linux has become a top priority.
	www.artwarez.org /open_cultures_blog_archive/cat_5copyright.html (625 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)