| | The Consequences of Token Frequency, Transitional Probability, and Non-Random Distributions of Lexical (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21) |
 | | In the present study, I compare and contrast the utility of token frequency (including "string" frequency; Krug 1997) versus transitional probablility statistics in an attempt to predict the frequency-of-occurence of word boundary palatalization as it occurs in a large corpus of naturally-occurring data. |
 | | Chomsky and halle 1968, Vogel and Kenesei 1990:340), may be emergent from the non-random distribution of speech segments in discourse. |
 | | Statistical notions such as transitional probablity that accurately reflect this non-random distribution have been implicated in the segmentation of speech sounds by both children and adults (Saffran, Newport and Aslin 1996). |
| www.unm.edu /~hdls/hdls-2/nathanbush.html (196 words) |