| |
| | Bryn Mawr Classical Review 95.07.08 |
 | | So he begins with a useful examination of Frontinus' vocabulary of water distribution, particularly of the divisions of usage (nomine Caesaris, privati, and usus publici; and, among last, the problematic castra, munera, and lacus). |
 | | Finally, a brief Conclusion (135-147) includes summary data from Frontinus, presented earlier, but brought together here according to the uses to which the water was put: the percentage (by aqueduct) of consumption by imperial, private, and public functions. |
 | | He himself observes that, "although most of Rome's aqueducts can be traced to terminal reservoirs within the city, there is almost a total lack of archaeological evidence as to what happened to their water after that point" (3). |
| ccat.sas.upenn.edu /bmcr/1995/95.07.08.html (1332 words) |
|