| |
| | Barnette review of Dreyfus |
 | | As such, GOFAI depicts mentality within the context of what philosophers know as the Representational Theory of Mind, according to which the mind is an entity which performs calculations over mental representations, or inner tokens or symbols which refer to features of the outer world. |
 | | To reinforce earlier GOFAI criticisms, he describes insuperable difficulties (outlined in 1972) confronting successful modelling of common-sense understanding, which requires a notion of relevance, contextually and holistically characterized, resulting from worldly, bodily experiences, not compatible with atomistic, symbolic data structures and discrete computations. |
 | | Thus, whether by means of symbolic tokens (GOFAI), or having been learned through adjusted network connections (PDP), relevance is not to be gleaned by means of providing more information for the system to work with and through. |
| www.valdosta.edu /~rbarnett/phi/dreyfus.html (1147 words) |
|