| |
| | Right Reason: General Philosophy Archives |
 | | Presumably the thesis is intended as a kind of normative claim: analytic philosophers ought to be conservative, given the nature of their discipline; there is something about analytic philosophy that entails conservatism, whether all analytic philosophers realize this or not. |
 | | Arguments are ultimately only as good as their premises, and while analytic philosophers are certainly capable, and very often willing, to expose the arguments made by deconstructionists, “gender feminists,” Marxists, and the like for the ludicrous fallacies they typically are, such philosophers do not always reject the premises of those arguments, or even their conclusions. |
 | | As the standard potted history of analytic philosophy would have it, analytic philosophers of the early to mid twentieth century tended to be either logical positivists of the Schlick, Neurath, or Carnap sort, or “therapeutic positivists” of the (later) Wittgenstein, Austin, or Ryle sort. |
| rightreason.ektopos.com /archives/cat_general_philosophy.html (3923 words) |
|