| |
| | [No title] |
 | | On this view, the analysis of ordinary language should reveal and clarify the assumptions which we commonly make about reality, knowledge, values, etc. However, according to the phases of logical atomism and logical positivism, ordinary language is fraught with confusions and must be supplanted by a rigorous and precise language. |
 | | Furthermore, according to Wittgenstein, language itself is really a composite of "language-games." What this metaphor of "language-games" suggests (at the risk of oversimplification for brevity's sake) is that there are different areas of human language, each with its own set of implicit rules, meanings, uses, and purposes. |
 | | The general field of religious language seems to have some application to this very important concern, particularly in respect to the nature of the inspiration in the giving of the Scriptures and to their continuing intrinsic nature. |
| wesley.nnu.edu /wesleyan_theology/theojrnl/11-15/15-02.htm (5847 words) |
|