| |
| | Universality of grammar and grammatical universals (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05) |
 | | Grammatical categories and markings, which we take for granted, are therefore by no means universal, and this is most evident when we compare different languages, language stages and language types. |
 | | Some grammatical morphemes are to be expected with high probability in a certain context, but they are not obligatory or redundant in so far as there are also alternative formations or markings so that among other things also stylistic and connotative considerations can play a role when they are selected by the speaker. |
 | | Grammatical categories are therefore by no means already to be considered as the basic categories of our thinking and experiencing and cannot be such; and this is the reason why there are for example no grammatical morphemes for size, form, weight, age, speed, rhythm, etc. either. |
| www.phil.uni-erlangen.de /~p2gerlw/ressourc/dauses1.html (6801 words) |
|