| |
| | 12 Wn.2d 364, JOHN DICK, Respondent, v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant |
 | | GREAT NORTHERN R. Feb. 1942] Opinion Per MILLARD, J. made definite and certain; and if the facts constituting negligence are specifically alleged, the plaintiff, in presenting his evidence, should be limited to proof of such facts. |
 | | GREAT NORTHERN R. Feb. 1942] Opinion Per MILLARD, J. freight car door was defective and out of repair, and in what respect appellant failed to furnish a reasonably safe place to work, was denied. |
 | | To place in bolder relief the manifest error, let us assume that the door was not defective, that the platform was not slippery, and that the only negligence of the appellant consisted in failure to make a proper inspection of the car door and platform. |
| www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/012wn2d/012wn2d0364.htm (1087 words) |
|