| |
| | DENNIS J. COONEY, PLAINTIFF, v. OSGOOD MACHINERY, INC., APPELLANT, v. PAUL MUELLER COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY RESPONDENT, ... |
 | | Applying relevant choice of law principles, we conclude that the Missouri workers' compensation statute should be given effect, and therefore affirm the dismissal of the third-party complaint seeking contribution against a Missouri employer. |
 | | In Neumeier v Kuehner (31 NY2d 121), yet another guest statute case, the Court in seeking to return greater predictability and uniformity to the law, adopted a series of three rules that had been proposed by Chief Judge Fuld (see, Tooker v Lopez, 24 NY2d at 585 [Fuld, C.J., concurring]). |
 | | Conversely, when the plaintiff-passenger is injured in the place of domicile and would be entitled to recover, the out-of-State driver should generally be unable to interpose the law of his or her domicile to defeat recovery (31 NY2d at 128). |
| straylight.law.cornell.edu /nyctap/I93_0047.htm (3762 words) |
|