| |
| | PointofLaw | PointOfLaw Featured Discussion: Alas, No Time for Tranquility |
 | | Indeed, for Chemerinsky — and, stay tuned Richard, I bet for Leahy, Kennedy, Biden, and other Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee — “Democrats need to oppose Roberts for the same reasons they fought against Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr. |
 | | in 1969, Harold Carswell in 1970, Robert Bork in 1987 and Clarence Thomas in 1991.” These reasons, Chemerinsky says are Roberts’s “staunch conservatism,” and the theory that he would “join with the most conservative justices to change the law in a conservative direction.” |
 | | Among the astonishing howlers in Chemerinsky’s analysis are his claims that “Bork was not defeated because of a smear campaign,” and that Justice Anthony Kennedy has been “a solid conservative,” but let’s let those pass. |
| www.pointoflaw.com /feature/archives/001531.php (496 words) |
|