| |
| | CJBS 27:1 - Predictions, Postdictions, and Hindsight Bias (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-20) |
 | | Because the hindsight bias effect suggests that when subjects receive outcome information, they perceive that outcome as inevitable, if postdictive phrasing of the estimation question appears to provide an outcome, then the hindsight bias should be identifiable in the postdiction condition. |
 | | Although hindsight bias is often proclaimed to be inevitable and robust, the meta-analysis performed by Christensen-Szalanski and Willham (1991) demonstrated that the effect is small. |
 | | While hindsight bias is consistently referred to as a robust, influential response pattern (e.g., Fischhoff, 1976), closer examination reveals that the question format (stimulus type) may be a moderating factor, and yet is rarely controlled for. |
| www.cpa.ca /cjbsnew/1995/april/cannon.html (5780 words) |
|