| |
| | Hormesis: a revolution in toxicology, risk assessment and medicine |
 | | To this end, we have developed a rigorous a priori process to assess and quantitatively evaluate possible hormetic dose−response relationships, estimate the frequency of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature and estimate which toxicological model occurred more frequently in the peer-reviewed literature (Calabrese, 2002, 2003; Calabrese and Baldwin, 2001a, 2003b). |
 | | In short, the hormesis model clearly outperforms either of the other two competitive models in fair head-to-head competition (Calabrese and Baldwin, 2001b, 2003a). |
 | | In fact, as the hormesis hypothesis can actually be tested with the available data, for the first time in the modern history of cancer risk assessment, we would be able to rely on a verifiable dose−response model and not depend on unverifiable extrapolations of animal data to estimate actual risk to humans. |
| www.nature.com /cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/embor/journal/v5/n1s/full/7400222.html (3050 words) |
|