| |
Humanitarian Intervention: A Review of Literature |
 | | What underlies the humanitarian intervention debate is a perceived tension between the values of ensuring respect for fundamental human rights and the primacy of the norms of sovereignty, non-intervention, and self determination which are considered essential factors in the maintenance of peace and international security (Danish Institute of International Affairs 1999, pp. |
 | | Yet it is equally true that to regard textual barriers to humanitarian intervention as decisive in the face of genocidal behavior is politically and morally unacceptable, especially in view of the qualifications imposed on the unconditional claims of sovereignty by the expanded conception of international human rights. |
 | | Broadly speaking, the moral arguments for and against humanitarian intervention fall into two categories: the realists and pluralists, on the one hand, for whom intervention undermines international order; and the solidarists and cosmopolitanists, on the other, for whom intervention may be a moral obligation stemming from membership in a cosmopolitan community of humankind. |
| www.ploughshares.ca /libraries/WorkingPapers/wp012.html (11138 words) |