| |
| | [fsl-discuss] Inalienable rights (Fwd: [RCumbow@GrahamDunn.com: RE: Destruction of work and the doctrine of waste]) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-03) |
 | | The right to life, liberty = and the pursuit of happiness, by contrast, are in theory inalienable = because, in our founding fathers' view, those rights inhere in a human being by = reason of their endowment by a Creator, and cannot be transferred to any other person. |
 | | Such uses of inalienable may = be inalienable to lawmakers and judges and the governments who are = enforcing, creating or intrepreting such laws, but inalienable human rights are of = a higher authority than law, the rule of law, lawmakers, rulers, jailers, judges, and kings, etc.. |
 | | Inalienable, then means rights which are above the law, = above the control of congress and outside of the reach of government, like = the right to the pursuit of happiness, the right to life, and the right to ungated knowledge, information and the tools to use it. |
| alt.org /pipermail/fsl-discuss/2002-March/000223.html (1505 words) |
|