| |
| | OSCN Found Document:Garst v. Love |
 | | The use of the inclosure, the use of the government land for grazing, and the keeping of the cattle in that pasture, were the component parts of the consideration; and each and every one was illegal, because the primary one--the maintenance of the inclosure, and the consequent "unlawful occupancy of the public lands"--was unlawful. |
 | | Webb, 20 Ohio St. 431, was a suit upon a promissory note, given in settlement of an account, part of the items of which were for intoxicating liquors, sold by the payee of the note to the maker, to be drunk upon the premises where sold, in violation of the statute. |
 | | While maintaining it, as the pleadings allege they were doing, they were engaged in the keeping and pasturing of cattle in a manner prohibited by law; and, so long as they are thus engaged, they can recover no compensation for their labors. |
| www.oscn.net /applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=63540 (1779 words) |
|