| |
| | Kim B et al., Current management of intracranial ependymomas in children. 2 (3), July 2002 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14) |
 | | The most characteristic finding to support a diagnosis for infratentorial ependymomas is downward extension of the tumor through the foramen of Magendie into the cervical subarachnoid space or through the foramen of Luschka into the cerebellopontine cistern(2, 8, 9, 22). |
 | | Review of the recent literature reveals that the rate of total resection for supratentorial ependymomas appears to be 53-72% and for infratentorial ependymoma 27-55%(4, 23-26, 28, 33, 35, 36, 43, 45). |
 | | Paulino insisted that the appropriate and safe volume for non-disseminated and low-grade infratentorial ependymomas is the tumor bed with a 2-cm safety margin and does not need to include the entire posterior fossa(30). |
| www.annals-neurosurgery.org /Kim_B/Kim_B_et_al_2002.htm (4316 words) |
|