| |
| | THEORY OF LINGUISTIC DERIVATION: CONTINUING STUDY |
 | | The second group includes groups that consider initiation of attacks and warfare against other linguistic groups to be, effectively, a means of affirmation of masculinity: Mohave, Quechan, (Yuman), Yavapai, and Comanche (all southwestern North America, to be discussed in sections four and five). |
 | | Violence initiated by groups that have voiced fricative allophones, in the form of genocide, and unprovoked warfare has presumably caused incalculably more loss of life than violence initiated by groups that have no voiced fricative allophones, and has, presumably, been the cause of most military violence between linguistic groups on the planet. |
 | | In other words, on the basis of the groups considered and the classifications made by the author, there is greater than a 95% probability that there is an association between level of violence in a linguistic group and the presence, or absence [including near-absence] of voiced fricative allophones in the language of a group. |
| www.tc.umn.edu /~reed0180/page4.html (10972 words) |
|