| |
| | RODNEY F |
 | | The injunctive order was void, as it sought support in earlier illegal and unconstitutional acts (deliberately reversing the frivolous criteria to "support" the summary judgment dismissal; denying appellant Fifth Amendment, statutory and case law, rights to a federal court forum when federal causes of action of constitutional magnitude are raised). |
 | | In bankruptcy court, the injunctive order was (a) to protect the illegal and corrupt seizure of appellant's properties; (b) to protect those attorneys, trustee, and others, who aided in the seizure of the properties; and compound the earlier violations. |
 | | The injunctive order, as applied after the fact by the Justice Department, magistrate Moulds, and district judge Raul Ramirez, clearly was intended to silence the reporting of the air disaster misconduct, and the extension of that misconduct to silence appellant via the sham California action. |
| www.defraudingamerica.com /contempt_appeal_brief.html (13901 words) |
|