| |
| | Book 6: Practice (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-12) |
 | | In 1544, Mari Serrana, on trial at Toledo, was charged with impeding the Inquisition, because she had endeavored to ascertain whether a certain person had testified in another case and what he had said--the mere attempt to learn what went on within those mysterious walls was treated as a crime. |
 | | At its best, the inquisitorial process left much to the temper and disposition of the judge; as modified by the Inquisition, the fate of the accused was virtually at the discretion of the tribunal, and that discretion was relieved of the wholesome restraint of publicity. |
 | | This, at least in appearance, removed one of the most repulsive features of the pure inquisitorial process, as the judge was no longer a party to the case and could affect a semblance of impartiality, even though he were, in reality, the instigator of the prosecution. |
| libro.uca.edu /lea2/6lea2.htm (5485 words) |
|