| | Public Health Agency of Canada - Mental Health - Quality of Life Measurement Among Persons with Chronic Mental Illness: ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-04) |
 | | A second type of error is systematic, and occurs when there is there is a systematic and unexpected pull on measures which tends to skew the results in a particular direction, leading to false conclusions (type I errors in inference). |
 | | Each instrument in Table 4 was given a rating from fair to good as to the reliability of its scales and the overall instrument (i.e., internal consistency, test-retest and alternate forms reliabilities) as well as the degree to which its validity had been established (i.e., face, content, construct, and concurrent/predictive validity). |
 | | Instruments which were rated "fair to good" had lower reliability coefficients, with the internal consistency of one or more scales falling into the.75 -.85 range and/or test-retest reliability of less than.75. |
| phac-aspc.gc.ca /mh-sm/mentalhealth/pubs/quality_of_life/chapter3.htm (4610 words) |