| |
| | UCLA Center for Language, Interaction, and Culture |
 | | That is, the grammatical structure of a yes/no type interrogative makes a particular response form relevant next, and makes responses that depart from that form noticeable and eventful. |
 | | To illustrate this I focus on the dense array of activities accomplished within type-conforming responses through variations in (i) the design of the turns they are embedded in, (ii) the tokens used to implement them (yes, yeah mhhmm, yep, etc.), and (iii) the prosodic contours through which those tokens are realized. |
 | | By describing a grammaticalized normative structure I show how yes/no type interrogatives provide speaker and analyst alike detailed tools for parsing turns that allow each of us to realize the activities, harmonious and discordant, emotional and dispassionate, compliant and subversive, out of which the richness of daily life is built. |
| www.sscnet.ucla.edu /clic/abstracts/abraym.htm (460 words) |
|