| |
| | Irony's Arrows/Eros |
 | | True irony, then, is not arrogant; it is humble, Socratically, because it senses no superiority in one position over the others in the whole drama and because it is based in a sense of fundamental kinship with the enemy, since every protagonist needs an antagonist in order to play out his or her drama. |
 | | So, "irony equals the transparent discrepancy between the literal statement and what is actually meant." (16) But, as Allemann said, the "discrepancy" is an "ironic field of tension or Spielraum, a "space with some play in it," and this space of tension has an antithetical structure." (17) One might say: it is dialectical. |
 | | Irony is a way of not-saying, i.e., of not-I speaking
or rather, irony is a way of understanding the not-saying, of understanding the not-I speaking
it is a depth psychological trope in which, as Nietzsche and Deleuze have said, the depth is on the surface. |
| web.syr.edu /~dlmiller/IronysArrows.htm (6120 words) |
|