| |
| | Nuova pagina 0 |
 | | If habituality in the present is expressed in the same way as irrealis (for instance by means of potentials, debitives, interrogatives, conditionals, futures, subjunctives and the like), then so is habituality in the past, while the reverse does not hold. |
 | | The association between habituality in the past and irrealis is attested in enough genetically and geographically unrelated languages to be a typologically significant phenomenon (some such languages are Bargam, Etsako, Gurr-Goni, Tamil, Tolkapaia Yavapalai, Xakas, and several Indo-European languages). |
 | | This suggests that there must be some specific connection between habituality in the past and irrealis in general, not between habituality in the past and some particular type of unactualized situation. |
| www.summerschoolaltconference.it /ALT/Abstracts/cristofaro.htm (413 words) |
|