| |
| | 64 Wn.2d 15, In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of DON ANTHONY WHITE, Petitioner, v. B. J. ... |
 | | The culpability of a defendant charged with murder, who has pleaded mental irresponsibility as a defense, is not to be determined under the irresistible impulse rule, since irresistible impulse is not mental irresponsibility under the law. |
 | | A defendant in a criminal case has no right under the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States to have the irresistible impulse doctrine applied to the defense of mental irresponsibility, nor to have it applied by the jury in determining if the death penalty be inflicted. |
 | | His contention is that certain instructions to the jury excluding lack of volition and irresistible impulse, if proper on the issue of guilt or innocence,«2» had the effect of excluding these psychiatric concepts from the consideration of the jury on the issue of what the sentence should be, i.e., death or life imprisonment. |
| www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/064wn2d/064wn2d0015.htm (5341 words) |
|