| |
| | [No title] |
 | | This language is clas sified in the literature in different ways: A. Volodin [}{\fs22\lang1033\langfe1049\langnp1033 Volodin, 1997}{\fs22\lang1033\langfe1049\langnp1033 ] assigns it to nominative languages, but G. Klimov [}{\fs22\lang1033\langfe1049\langnp1033 Klimov, 1973}{\fs22\lang1033\langfe1049\langnp1033 ] considers it to be an ergative one. |
 | | Such facts as the appearance of elements of the active system in dialects of the Tabasaran (an ergative language), which are absent not only in the languages of neighboring territories, but also in languages spoken at a distance of thousan ds of kilometers, confirm this. |
 | | Such a considerable difference in the structure of languages fits in well with the opinion of A. Volodin [}{ \fs22\lang1033\langfe1049\langnp1033 Volodin, 1997}{\fs22\lang1033\langfe1049\langnp1033 ], already noted, that the Itelmen language does not have a genetic affiliation with the languages of the Chuktko-Kamchatkan group, their lexical and morphological similarities being the result of borrowing. |
| www.ksu.ru /conf/LENCA-2/214.rtf (1621 words) |
|