| |
| | 3 Reductionist Nightmares, Game Trees and Ant Country |
 | | We like to believe that the results of an experiment, or the aggregate of a set of processes, are at the same level of complexity as we started with (Cohen and Stewart 1991a, Cohen and Stewart 1991b). |
 | | Stewart and I have reformed the emergence/conservation-of-complexity problem as "Ant Country", the unresolvable complexity which is located between top-down and bottom-up explanations in nearly all cases (Stewart and Cohen 1994, Stewart and Cohen 1997). |
 | | Stewart and I have allegiance to the opposite view, which is that explanations diverge (Cohen and Stewart 1994, Stewart and Cohen 1994, Stewart and Cohen 1997); real reductionist explanations of each property of the cell must require many chemical experts, then many physicists to explain each chemical property. |
| www.eeng.dcu.ie /~tkpw/tcr/volume-02/number-03/node3.html (1279 words) |
|