| |
| | AAS Abstracts: Japan Session 33 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-09) |
 | | Studies of sociolinguistic phenomena in Japanese are particularly vulnerable to this kind of criticism, because they more often than not present characterizations based on "normative"/stereotypical linguistic usages, or language and cultural ideologies, rather than accurate descriptions of actual language practices. |
 | | Japanese honorifics have commonly been treated as direct indexes of contextual features, such as status difference and the degree of intimacy (Ide, 1989; Niyekawa, 1991, etc.). |
 | | For example, referent honorifics may be used to index (indirectly) different social meanings, such as the referent's power, distance toward the addressee, the speaker's class status, and speech-act types. |
| www.aasianst.org /absts/1997abst/japan/j33.htm (1099 words) |
|