| | Doe v. Chiles (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08) |
 | | In that case, the plaintiffs claimed a statutory right pursuant to a section of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 ("AACWA"), requiring that "'[i]n order for a State to be eligible for payments under this part, it shall have a plan approved by the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] which. |
 | | As discussed, this is not the case with the relevant Medicaid regulations, which, in requiring states to provide medical assistance without any delay attributable to administrative processes and in establishing concrete time limits on processing Medicaid applications, flesh out the meaning of section 1396a(a)(8)'s reasonable promptness mandate. |
 | | See, e.g., Defendants' Official Capacity Answer and Affirmative Defenses ("Answer") at ¶ 9(c) (admitting that Jane Doe 1 was "seeking a residential placement in an ICF/DD facility for 8 years"), ¶ 10(d) ("Admit that [John] Doe 2 has been on a waiting list for an ICF/DD placement for approximately five years. |
| lw.bna.com /lw/19980317/965144.htm (6906 words) |