| |
| | Decision on Prosecution Motion for Joinder |
 | | That Chamber based its decision denying joinder on the distinction, in time and place, between the Kosovo Indictment, on the one hand, and the Croatia and Bosnia Indictments, on the other, as well as on the distinction in the way in which the accused is alleged to have acted in each Indictment. |
 | | However, joinder is likely to lead to a further delay in the start of a trial against this accused, as well as to a more complex and lengthy trial, with almost four times as many Prosecution witnesses testifying than if he were to be tried alone. |
 | | Although joinder may, to some extent, expedite the start of the trial of Stanisic and Simatovic, the Trial Chamber concludes that this advantage does not outweigh the adverse effect that joinder would have on all accused, in that it will unduly prolong the length of a joint trial. |
| www.un.org /icty/seselj/trialc/decision-e/051110.htm (6393 words) |
|