| |
| | CASRIP Newsletter - Vol 14, Iss 2 |
 | | The Voda court announced that the proper exercise of judicial discretion demands a case-specific analysis, concerning possible interference with obligations under patent treaties, and consideration of the important values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity. |
 | | The court extensively explored the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness and obligations under treaties, expressing concern that exercising jurisdiction in this case “could” detrimentally affect one or all of them. |
 | | 42 Moreover, the considerations of convenience, judicial economy and fairness should balance a concern for the time and resources of the plaintiff and defendant, as well as those of the court. |
| www.law.washington.edu /Casrip/Newsletter/Vol14/newsv14i2US1.html (2654 words) |
|