| |
| | FreiK's WebLog : Language & Library Evolution (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-06) |
 | | And it turns out that the language needed some new features, like concepts, thread safety, concurrency, a strong memory model, improved security, and the library needed to repair, oh, perhaps a really awful std::kstring implementation, and perhaps std::vektor. |
 | | But also, this K-- language is incredibly popular, to the tune of roughly 75% of worldwide software revenue. |
 | | Language users need to be able to rely on the old library, while bringing in portions of the new runtime, so your legacy code base can migrate as a business model allows. |
| blogs.msdn.com /freik/archive/2006/05/25/607728.aspx (410 words) |
|