| |
| | FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code |
 | | Penterman and Kamnik alleged in their amended complaint that Dasho deprived them of their constitutionally protected rights, and sought remedies under 42 U.S.C. The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court in part, holding that Penterman and Kamnik failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. |
 | | Penterman and Kamnik contend that there were irregularities in these SVAT tests and inconsistencies between Dasho's report and the data actually discovered during the course of the testing. |
 | | To the extent the complaint alleges that Dasho was negligent, we agree with the court of appeals that the due process clause is not implicated by the negligence of an official causing unintended loss of, or injury to, life, liberty, or property. |
| caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /scripts/getcase.pl?court=wi&vol=sc\96-0164&invol=1 (5773 words) |
|