| |
| | [No title] |
 | | One might even say that for Bonifacio the exposure of the Katipunan was not a bad but a good thing: the time of temporizing was ended, the time of action had been forced on the Katipunan, whether it was ready or not, whether it had enough men and arms or not. |
 | | No question at all that the Katipunan was proletarian, that Bonifacio, Jacinto and the other Sons of the People were proletarian, and that their uprising in the outskirts of Manila was, therefore, a proletarian movement, a revolt of the masses. |
 | | The Manila Katipunan could be captured and its ideals betrayed only if its uprising had been successful, had become the Revolution, in which case it would have had the right to impose its ideas on the entire country, the burghers in Cavite included. |
| members.aol.com /aringaseo/bonifacio.txt (10522 words) |
|