| | Socialism Today - Did Ken deliver |
 | | LIVINGSTONE’S COMPLIANCE with the basic tenets of Blairism — privatisation and the placing of profits before the pay and conditions of public sector workers — means, in spite of his stated intentions, his policies will perpetuate the obscene gap between rich and poor and the social deprivation that blights the capital city. |
 | | Livingstone had been committed to a "unified underground system in the public sector", but instead accepted a unified management overseeing £1 billion of investment contracts in the Tube every year, with what is a risk-free venture for the private consortia whose long-term profits are guaranteed by the tax payer. |
 | | Livingstone’s victory in 2000 represented more than a referendum vote on who should own London Underground; it signalled a rejection of all the hated Thatcherite policies of New Labour and revealed the potential for a mass left alternative, the opportunity for which Livingstone, pursuing a New Labour agenda, refused to grasp. |
| www.socialismtoday.org /83/livingstone.html (2836 words) |