| |
| | [No title] |
 | | In addition, because the district court did not specifically address plaintiff’s claim under Maryland’s Wage and Hour law, and, on appeal, plaintiff did not pursue the state law claim, this issue was also not addressed by the Fourth Circuit panel. |
 | | Law §§ 201-a, 201-b(1), 201-c, 201-e(2-a) and (3-c), 201-f, 201-h and 26-a of New York’s Kosher Laws on their face violate the Establishment Clause Case # 798 (9/00) (E.D.N.Y.), affirmed, Case # 1223 (5/02) (New York kosher fraud laws giving preference to Orthodox Hebrew religious requirements were unconstitutional on their face. |
 | | Even assuming the challenged laws were enacted for a valid secular purpose, they violated the Establishment Clause by fostering excessive State entanglement with religion and by producing a primary effect that both advanced and inhibited religion. |
| www.paradigmpub.com /docs.asp?case=kosher (989 words) |
|