| |
| | Judgment in the matter of Koumi v City of Unley |
 | | I have heard the evidence of Mr Koumi, the proponent, and certainly you have made some very good points; of Mr Litchfield, a qualified town-planner and officer of the Council, and of Mr Dorrestyn, an experienced qualified traffic engineer. |
 | | I have had the benefit of viewing the site and locality as defined by Mr Litchfield with which I generally agree, although I think, and he agreed as well, that it could well be extended further along Young Street, further to the south along Kenilworth Road and a little further along Glen Osmond Road. |
 | | Nothing that was presented to the Court by Mr Koumi invalidates these opinions and conclusions and I have no other expert evidence to the contrary. |
| www.courts.sa.gov.au /courts/environment/judgments/2004_1-6/koumi_v_unley.html (548 words) |
|