| |
| | In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc. the LTV Corporation, et al., Debtors. LTV STEEL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ... |
 | | In March, 1993, LTV moved to reclassify Aetna's claims as general unsecured claims and to estimate those claims to facilitate both the determination of the feasibility of the Plan and the establishment of an appropriate claims' reserve. |
 | | LTV now asks, under § 509(c) [FN4], to subordinate Aetna's subrogation claims to the claims of the individual workers until all the workers' claims are paid in full. |
 | | LTV first asserts that this Court has already ruledin Chateaugay, supra, 155 BR 625, that Aetna's claims must be subordinated to the individual workers' claims until the workers are paid in full. |
| www.vtb.uscourts.gov /opinions/published/1993wl563068.html (2419 words) |
|