| |
| | LZW, BTEC, and slow compression |
 | | And then, at some point, people realized that LZ77 was actually a more efficient method for many implementations: The length/offset matches + literals took up the same or less space than an LZ78 dictionary of the same material, and LZ77 had other benefits like much simpler decoding requirements (which directly translates to decompression speed). |
 | | however, LZ77 can refer to any arbitrary string that had occured previously, wheras LZW is limited to whatever is in the dictionary. |
 | | yeah, LZ77 is looking good, just I figured maybe I could squeeze more out of LZW, eg, by mapping the dictionary directly to the huffman tree so that in effect the bit-code refers directly to the string in question, vs a length/offset pair. |
| www.codecomments.com /message418140.html (2620 words) |
|