| |
| | [No title] |
 | | This paper demonstrates that, on the contrary, the potential mobility and independence of a phonological entity are not correlated either with each other or with the presence or absence of a root node, and thus these cannot be used to motivate a structural distinction between latent segments and floating features. |
 | | In Chaha (.i.McCarthy (1983);,.i.Rose (1994);,.i.Archangeli and Pulleyblank (forthcoming);), the third-person singular object is indicated with labialization on the verb (4). |
 | | Finally, in the arena of ghost segments there is a lot of terminological confusion, since both latent segments which sometimes materialize, for example the French final consonants, and featureless consonant and vowel slots, such as those that have been proposed for French h-aspir, have been called ghosts. |
| roa.rutgers.edu /files/29-1094/roa-29-zoll-1.doc (5122 words) |
|