| |
| | celex-txt - 61998J0236 - |
 | | Even if the two types of work were deemed to be of equal value, there was on any view no discrimination since the terms of employment applicable to midwives and those applicable to clinical technicians were not related, direct or indirectly, to the sex of the worker concerned. |
 | | In any event, the Landsting argued, the inconvenient-hours supplement and the value of the reduced working time must be incorporated in the basis for a pay comparison and, if they are, there is no pay differential to the detriment of midwives. |
 | | The value of the reduction in working time, which the Landsting assesses at 11.4% of the basic salary, should therefore be included in the overall amount of monthly pay for the purposes of the comparison. |
| eur-lex.europa.eu /smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=en&numdoc=61998J0236 (3098 words) |
|