| |
| | Vagueness, Semantics, and the Language of Thought |
 | | Deep Thought's behavior can be at least partly predicted and explained using a semantic, contentful level--Deep Thought believes it is better to castle before deploying the queen, wants to keep its knights off the wings, desires to control the center of the board, and so on. |
 | | But most, and maybe all, natural language predicates are vague--that is, they have objects in their domain of application such that the predicate neither clearly applies nor clearly fails to apply to those objects. |
 | | Thus, a semantics that ignores this characteristic is not a semantics suitable for a language with vague predicates. |
| psyche.cs.monash.edu.au /v1/psyche-1-01-dewitt.html (7837 words) |
|