| |
| | UTN #26: On the Encoding of Latin, Greek, Cyrillic, and Han |
 | | Mere historic relatedness is insufficient reason to unify scripts, however, as Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic can ultimately all trace their roots back to Phoenician, and Phoenician itself is then related to Aramaic and all its descendants, from Hebrew and Arabic to farflung outliers like Sogdian, Uighur, and even Mongolian. |
 | | And rather than simply adopting the script at one point and then evolving it off in some independent direction, the typical pattern for each of these cultures was over the centuries to keep adding to the store of Han ideographs they used by continued borrowing of large new sets of them directly from China. |
 | | Unlike the case for Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic, there is a longstanding cultural tradition in Japan, China, and Vietnam, of viewing "Chinese characters" as being of shared identity throughout the region. |
| www.unicode.org /notes/tn26 (2253 words) |
|