| |
| | Flower & Murray, A History of Philosophy in America, Chap. 8 |
 | | Yet all of these, in one way or another, were seeking to overcome in some higher synthesis the difficulties left by Kant: Cousin, in his eclecticism, Coleridge in his own logic, {465} Fichte and Schelling by their versions of objective idealism, and Emerson and Alcott in the ways explored in the previous chapters. |
 | | Above all, the chasm which Kant left between the noumenal and phenomenal worlds establishes an absolute dichotomy between that which is knowable by science and the understanding, and that which is permanently unavailable–the knowledge of the world as it really is, {477} of God, immortality, and the freedom and purpose of the moral order. |
 | | He was one with the rest of the Hegelians at least in his belief that aesthetics is a fully philosophic enterprise, and that the fine arts are as susceptible of analysis as literature. |
| sun.soci.niu.edu /~phildept/Dye/StLouis.html (21055 words) |
|