| |
| | Brent G. Eilefson's Lemon--Nothing But Problems |
 | | Without binding itself to any rigid, uncompromising test, the Supreme Court is once again ascertaining the merits of an Establishment Clause controversy based upon the intent of the framers' of the Constitution--simply, preventing the establishment of a national religion and the attenuating fear of the use of governmental power to coerce support for that religion. |
 | | The resulting test pieced together by the majority, thereafter dubbed the Lemon test, was designed to prevent the three main evils against which the Establishment Clause was intended to afford protection: `sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activity. |
 | | The test was set forth as follows: First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion...; finally, the statute must not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion. |
| www.dudleyandsmith.com /wsbge.html (7815 words) |
|