Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Topic: Lesser included offense

    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

Encyclopedia: Perjury A lesser included offense, in criminal law, is a crime for which all of the elements necesary to impose liability are also elements found in a more serious crime. Solicitation is a crime; it is an inchoate offense that consists of a person inciting, counseling, advising, urging, or commanding another to commit a crime with the specific intent that the person solicited commit the crime. Extortion is a criminal offense, which occurs when a person obtains money, behaviour, or other goods and/or services from another by wrongfully threatening or inflicting harm to his person, reputation, or property. www.nationmaster.com /encyclopedia/Perjury   (2336 words)

Criminal conversion -- Facts, Info, and Encyclopedia article As such, it is a lesser included offense of the crime of theft. It differs from (The act of taking something from someone unlawfully) theft in that it does not include the element of intending to deprive the owner of the use of that property. An example might be tapping someone's power line, cable or gas. www.absoluteastronomy.com /encyclopedia/c/cr/criminal_conversion.htm   (119 words)

Univ. of Mississippi Law Library - Faculty Publications Habeas Corpus Review of State Trial Court Failure to Give Lesser Included Offense Instructions, 16 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 617 (1983). Hegel Fragment on the Life-Course of God, 12 Clio 401 (1983). library.law.olemiss.edu /library/facultypubs.shtml   (4563 words)

w961693w.txt Because such offenses are necessarily established by proof of the charged offense, the parties will have been focusing their respective efforts on proving or raising doubts as to the elements of the lesser-included offenses. Second, even if the charged capital offense had lesser- included offenses, an instruction as to those lesser-included offenses might not be supported by the evidence, while an instruction as to one or more lesser-unincluded offenses might be. Because the second-degree murder in- struction was a lesser-included offense only as to the State's premeditated-murder theory, and because the jury was not given a lesser-included-offense instruction that applied to the State's felony-murder theory, the dissent would have reverse, Ibid. www.usdoj.gov /osg/briefs/1996/w961693w.txt   (4563 words)

Michigan Appellate Digest - 97912 People v Hendricks The purpose of the restrictions upon which lesser included offenses may be submitted to the jury is to prevent the jury from usurping the punishment function of the court. A cognate lesser included offense is one which shares some common elements of the greater offense, and is of the same class or category, but has some additional elements not found in the greater offense. To merit an instruction on a cognate lesser included offense, the greater offense and the lesser offense must have an inherent relationship, and the evidence must be able to support a conviction of the lesser offense. courtofappeals.mijud.net /Digest/newHTML/9791211.htm   (578 words)

Brooks v. State (Per Curiam) CR96-771 Prior to submission of the case to the jury, Brown requested that the jury be instructed on the offense of second-degree murder on the basis that it was a lesser-included offense of capital felony murder. Consequently, we must determine whether second-degree murder is a lesser-included offense of capital felony murder and, if so, whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant the instruction on second-degree murder. Where the indictment for a greater offense does not contain allegations of all the ingredients of the lesser offense, a conviction of the lesser cannot be sustained, even though the evidence may supply the missing element. courts.state.ar.us /opinions/1996a/960916/cr96-771.html   (578 words)

Michigan Appellate Digest - 197735 People v Torres (On Remand) An offense may be a lesser included offense of another offense even if the penalties for the two offenses are the same. In this case, the prosecutor requested the instruction on the lesser included offense of simple possession, and thus the court was obliged to give the instruction. Generally, the duty of a court to instruct on a lesser included offense is determined by the evidence. courtofappeals.mijud.net /Digest/newHTML/19773521.htm   (1026 words)

FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code The death sentence may not constitutionally be imposed after a jury verdict of guilt of a capital offense where the jury was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included offense. Louisiana, 428 U.S., this Court had struck down a mandatory death penalty statute which required the judge to give the jury the option of convicting on lesser included offenses whether or not such instructions were warranted by the evidence, on the ground that such a statute gave the jury de facto, standardless sentencing discretion. In this Court petitioner contends that the prohibition on giving lesser included offense instructions in capital cases violates both the Eighth Amendment as made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by substantially increasing the risk of error in the factfinding process. caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=US&vol=447&invol=625   (1026 words)

NE Law Express If the lesser offense is found to be a lesser-included offense, a court thereafter goes on to the second part of the Williams test and determines whether an instruction on the lesser-included offense is justified based on the evidence at trial. After Sutherlin appealed, the Court was called upon to answer whether the probate court correctly determined that the appointment was not made in compliance with the law and what was the correct procedure for removing a personal representative for noncompliance. The Supreme Court focused its analysis of the appeal on two questions presented: (1) Whether the county court correctly determined that the appointment was not made in compliance with the law and (2) what was the correct procedure for removing a personal representative for noncompliance within the statutory requirements of the application process. www.nebar.com /resources/nelawexpress/scjournals/2001sc/scfeb23.htm   (1026 words)

§ 1.10 Scope of the Offense Therefore, the test for determining whether an offense is a lesser included offense is whether all the essential elements of the lesser offense are included in the greater offense. (5) the offense is defined as a continuing course of conduct and the defendant’s course of conduct was uninterrupted, unless the law specifies that specific periods of such conduct constitute separate offenses. Where offenses that deal with property, such as computer mischief, vandalism, theft, fraud, and trespass, there is only one offense regardless of the number of victims. cybercrimes.net /99MSCCC/MSCCC/Article1/1.10.html   (1530 words)

The juvenile court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate for an offense not alleged in the petition nor included in the offense that was alleged [In re D.D.] (03-2-06) In one issue, appellant contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate appellant delinquent by committing the offense of terroristic threat because that offense was neither alleged in the petition nor a lesser-included offense of retaliation. An offense is a lesser-included offense if it is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the charged offense. In a bench trial, the court is authorized to find the appellant guilty of any lesser-included offense for which the State provides the required proof. www.tjpc.state.tx.us /publications/reviews/03/03-2-06.htm   (911 words)

Criminal Appeal: Lesser Included Offense When the defendant objected that assault with a firearm is not a lesser included offense of attempted murder, the court modified the offense to attempted voluntary manslaughter, which is a LIO of attempted murder. S123728, in which the Court of Appeal held that battery is a lesser included offense of robbery where the accusatory pleading alleges the taking was accomplished by force and fear. Battery is not a lesser-included offense of torture under either the elements test or the accusatory pleading test. www.crimblawg.com /lesser_included_offense   (519 words)

Section 29-110 When in a prosecution for murder the statute of limitations bars a conviction for manslaughter, the defendant is not entitled to an instruction for manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder unless he or she elects to waive the defense of the statute of limitations. Fleeing from justice The phrase "fleeing from justice" means to leave one's usual abode or to leave the jurisdiction where an offense has been committed, with intent to avoid detection, prosecution, or punishment for some public offense. In habeas corpus proceeding where claim was made that court lacked jurisdiction because prosecution was barred by statute of limitations, adjudication in original prosecution that petitioner tolled statute by fleeing from justice is binding upon petitioner and federal court. statutes.unicam.state.ne.us /Corpus/statutes/chap29/R2901010.html   (519 words)

FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code (c) Although an actor's mistake of law may constitute a defense to the offense charged, he may nevertheless be convicted of a lesser included offense of which he would be guilty if the law were as he believed. (b) In a prosecution for an offense that does not constitute a felony, it is an affirmative defense to prosecution that the actor engaged in the proscribed conduct because he was compelled to do so by force or threat of force. (2) a written interpretation of the law contained in an opinion of a court of record or made by a public official charged by law with responsibility for interpreting the law in question. caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /txcodes/pe000800.html   (519 words)

Criminal Attempt Law in Missouri: Death of a Tale of Two Theories If, however, the attempt verdict director is being given as a lesser-included offense and the target crime has already been defined by its own verdict director, it is permissible to forgo defining the target crime in the attempt verdict director, as long as neither party objects. Thus, for the offenses formerly known as common law attempts the punishment is "intended to be greater than that specified in the general inchoate offense statute." "[P]ossession of materials to be employed in the commission of the offense, which are specifically designed for such unlawful use or which can serve no lawful purpose of the actor under the circumstances" will normally amount to a substantial step. www.mobar.org /journal/2000/mayjun/swingle.htm   (4722 words)

Trial Stages: Merits: Guilty Pleas O'Connor, No. 01-0403, 58 MJ 450 (an improvident plea to a CPPA-based clause 3 offense under Article 134 may be upheld as a provident plea to a lesser-included offense under clause 2 of Article 134). Redlinski, 58 M.J. 2003) (for a plea to an attempt offense to be provident, the military judge must advise the accused of the elements of attempt as well as the elements of the intended offense, either explicitly or inferentially). O'Connor, No. 01-0403, 58 MJ 450 (in this case, where it is unclear from the providence inquiry and the record whether appellant was pleading guilty to possession and receipt of virtual or actual child pornography, his pleas of guilty to violating clause 3 of Art. www.armfor.uscourts.gov /digest/2003dig/IVB2.htm   (234 words)

People v. Garcia 3d at 377 (trial judge's failure to give sua sponte an instruction on the lesser-included offense was not error; a finding of guilt on the lesser-included offense would not have comported with trial counsel's view of a desirable resolution of the case). Further, allowing the trial court to instruct the jury, sua sponte, on a lesser-included offense comports with the notion that the trial court may give an instruction, requested by the State, on a lesser-included offense despite defendant's objection. The question of the trial court's authority to submit instructions to the jury, sua sponte, on a lesser-included offense was not at issue. www.state.il.us /court/Opinions/SupremeCourt/1999/November/Opinions/HTML/84354.htm   (234 words)

Michigan Appellate Digest - 115665 People v Bearss The lesser offense of nonsufficient funds checks was a cognate included offense, and thus the jury had not necessarily found the defendant guilty of it when it convicted on the charged offense. A cognate lesser included offense is an allied offense of the same nature as the greater offense. It is possible to commit the crime of taking by false pretenses without writing three nonsufficient checks within ten days, and thus the latter offense is a cognate lesser included offense of the former offense. courtofappeals.mijud.net /Digest/newHTML/11566511.htm   (639 words)

39-13-506. Statutory rape. Statutory rape is not a lesser included offense of rape of a child, nor is it a lesser grade offense of rape of a child. Since the offense of statutory rape includes an age element whereas the offense of rape does not, and the offense of rape includes the element of force whereas the offense of statutory rape does not, statutory rape was not a lesser included offense in a prosecution for rape by force or coercion. Evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's statutory rape and sexual battery convictions where, although the victim was an accomplice, the victim's testimony regarding the offenses was sufficiently corroborated; evidence was sufficient to prove the defendant, the victim's principle, performed oral sex on the victim and when confronted did not deny the allegations. www.state.tn.us /tccy/tnchild/39/39-13-506.htm   (808 words)

Michigan Appellate Digest - 120107 People v Weeder The determination whether the offense of negligent homicide is included depends upon the offense charged; that manslaughter committed in the operation of a vehicle is submitted to the jury as a lesser included offense of the charged offense does not render the charged offense to include negligent homicide. An instruction on the lesser included offense of negligent homicide in the absence of a charge of manslaughter committed in the operation of a vehicle is appropriate only when supported by the evidence. The offense of negligent homicide is deemed by statute to be included within every crime of manslaughter charged to have been committed in the operation of a vehicle. courtofappeals.mijud.net /Digest/newHTML/12010711.htm   (808 words)

73 Wn. App. 644, STATE v. GALLEGOS Because Gallegos failed to rebut the inference of wanton or willful disregard, and that inference is an element of the crime of attempting to elude, Gallegos has failed to prove he was guilty of the lesser included offense of refusal to cooperate instead of the greater offense of eluding a pursuing police vehicle. He argues that the trial court erred by excluding evidence about his state of mind and his affirmative defense of necessity, refusing to instruct the jury on the necessity defense, and refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of refusal to cooperate with an officer. After both parties rested, Gallegos asked the court to instruct the jury on the necessity defense and on the lesser included offense of refusal to cooperate with an officer. www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/appellate/073wnapp/073wnapp0644.htm   (2990 words)

DCBA Brief, Judicial Practice Tips Instructing the Jury in Criminal Cases: An Update The rule established by Garcia is that, in appropriate circumstances, the trial court possesses the discretion to instruct the jury sua sponte on lesser-included offenses over the defendant’s objection. Second, allowing a trial court to instruct on lesser-included offenses sua sponte comports with the rule that the trial court may give instructions on lesser-included offenses when the State requests them over a defendant’s objection. The court explained that a trial court does not have a duty to instruct the jury sua sponte on lesser-included offenses, but rather left that decision within the trial court’s discretion. www.dcba.org /brief/judpractice/0300.htm   (2990 words)

96-0820.DOC We therefore conclude that Vian has not shown prejudice from the failure to object to the lesse r-included offense instruction inasmuch as it appears that the jury was prepared to convict her of the more serious charge had there not been a lesser alternative. We conclude Vian has not met her burden to show that counsel\rquote s performance was deficient for not consulting with her on the giving of a lesser-included offense instruction. The jury found Vian guilty o n the lesser-included offense of causing bodily harm on that particular charge, and also found her guilty on the two remaining charges as well. www.courts.state.wi.us /ca/opinions/96/96-0820.DOC   (1096 words)

ILW.COM - Sui v. INS While Sui did not explicitly argue before the IJ that he had not been formally charged with the crime of "attempt," he clearly argued that his conviction did not constitute an attempt under subsection (U), and he also argued that attempt was not a lesser included offense under his statute of conviction. Sui also argued in his brief that in Onyido, attempt was a lesser included offense of the fraud crime of which the alien had been convicted, which was not true in Sui's case. Sui disputes the appropriateness of this conclusion, arguing that "attempt" must be understood only to refer to the substantive offense of attempt, rather than to convictions for other crimes that might involve facts showing an attempt to commit another listed offense. www.ilw.com /lawyers/immigdaily/cases/2001,0612-Sui.shtm   (1096 words)

Phyllis E. Mann, lawyers in Alexandria, LA, Louisiana A lesser-included offense is defined as an offense that may be proven by the same facts or by less than all the facts for the offense with which a defendant is charged. When a trial court instructs a jury on a lesser-included offense, it must apply the law to the facts. The jury must be reasonably able to infer a fact from the evidence that creates an issue as to whether the defendant committed the charged offense. www.lawyers.com /pmannlaw/article.jsp?practArea=38&articleIndex=2   (736 words)

96-8121 -- U.S. v. Duran -- 10/07/1997 In the present case, the district court ostensibly determined the crime of assault by striking, beating or wounding was not a lesser included offense of assault with a dangerous weapon because the crime of striking, beating or wounding did not contain the element of use of a dangerous weapon. The fact that the offense of assault by striking, wounding, or beating does not contain the element of use of a dangerous weapon does not mean the offense is not a lesser included offense of assault with a dangerous weapon. Monroe's base offense level by four points for using a dangerous weapon. www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/1997/10/96-8121.htm   (736 words)

Converted file pds Second, if a trial court determines that an alleged lesser included offense is not inherently included in the crime charged under step one, then it must compare the statute defining the alleged lesser included offense with the charging instrument in the case. A trial court’s ruling on the admission of evidence is reviewed upon appeal only for an abuse of discretion, and we will reverse only where the ruling is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the trial court. Allen next argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to correct error, wherein Allen alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel due to certain inaction by his first trial counsel. www.state.in.us /judiciary/opinions/archive/03070101.pds.html   (736 words)

State v. Brownell, A-01-545, 11 Neb. App. 68 On appeal, Brownell contends that the district court erred in concluding that second degree false imprisonment is a lesser-included offense of first degree false imprisonment and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of second degree false imprisonment. The hearing, held on April 26, presented issues to the court of whether second degree false imprisonment is a lesser-included offense of first degree false imprisonment and whether the procedure used in the instant case comported with the due process requirements of the U.S. and Nebraska Constitutions. Further, the offense of first degree false imprisonment requires that this restraint be either under terrorizing circumstances, under circumstances which expose the person to the risk of serious bodily injury, or with the intent to hold the individual in a condition of involuntary servitude. www.nol.org /home/ncpa/ctopinio/A01-545.htm   (1596 words)

0078021.txt Nonetheless, the majority concludes that Hudgins's acquittal on the charge of robbery was an implied acquittal of the lesser-included offense of petit larceny and that Hudgins therefore could not be prosecuted for the greater offense of grand larceny. In Graves, which did not involve a double jeopardy challenge, this Court held that grand larceny from the person was not a lesser-included offense of robbery, at least under the specific language of the robbery indictment in that case. The Graves majority went on to say that because the perimeter for larceny "from the person" is more restrictive than the "in his presence" perimeter sufficient for robbery, proof that the theft was "in his presence" as required for robbery will not necessarily prove the "from the person" element of grand larceny from the person. www.courts.state.va.us /opinions/opncavtx/0078021.txt   (11239 words)

No. 02-1824: Dretke v. Haley - Amicus (Merits) In that circumstance, the defendant is reasonably understood as "actually innocent" of the greater offense even though he remains guilty of a lesser included offense. Application of the actual innocence exception to defendants who are innocent of an aggravated offense but guilty of a lesser offense is somewhat more difficult to justify than application of the exception to defendants who are entirely innocent. Nonetheless, the Court decided that the actual innocence inquiry must focus on the "elements that render a defendant eligible for the death penalty" (id. at 347) because the Court was "striv[ing] to construct an analog to the simpler situation represented by the case of a noncapital defendant" innocent of a crime (id. at 341). www.usdoj.gov /osg/briefs/2003/3mer/1ami/2002-1824.mer.ami.html   (7491 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.