| |
| | [No title] |
 | | But the comparative moral, material, and political egalitarianism that prevailed at the founding among moderately propertied white men was surrounded by an array of other fixed, ascriptive systems of unequal status, all largely unchallenged by the American revolutionaries.2 Men were thought naturally suited to rule over women, within both the family and the polity. |
 | | Yet Pateman acknowledges that the premise of classical liberal contract theory--that all people are "naturally free and equal"--is potentially "subversive of all authority relations, including conjugal relations." She contends, correctly, that early liberal theorists like Locke responded by asserting women were not naturally equal to men. |
 | | First, on this view, purely liberal and republican conceptions of civic identity are seen as frequently unsatisfy~ng to many Americans, because they contain elements that threaten, rather than affirm, sincere, reputable beliefs in the propriety of the privileged positions that whites, Christianity, Anglo-Saxon traditions, and patriarchy have had in the United States. |
| xroads.virginia.edu /~PUBLIC/temp1/temp1/smith1.txt (11182 words) |
|