| |
| | CAMBRIDGE RESEARCH PARK, LLC - Decision on Motions in Limine, Partial Decision and Partial Summary Decision (July 31, ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-19) |
 | | In separately-filed motions in limine, both the Department and the applicant move to redact Issue 3 by eliminating from its scope the "pollution of the Charles River" and "the removal of contaminants." They argue that the Waterways Regulations regulate neither the cleanup of hazardous waste sites nor discharges to waters of the Commonwealth. |
 | | I treat the motion in limine as a motion for partial summary decision on these issues because, as to materiality, the motion is sufficiently made and supported as 310 CMR 1.01(11)(f) requires; the petitioner's argument is wholly a legal one, and requires, thus, no independent, supporting proof. |
 | | The applicant's motion in limine is therefore denied to the extent that it seeks such relief. |
| www.mass.gov /oaa/decision/00/camb003.htm (3321 words) |
|