| |
| | AAUP: Academic Boycotts |
 | | The plans for the conference in Bellagio, Italy, on academic boycotts to which he refers, which I learned about early in February, by no means suggested that its central purpose was to denounce academic boycotts. |
 | | In a scholarly conference “whose central purpose was to denounce academic boycotts,” one would expect to find several contributions from philosophers and several from natural scientists: any academic boycott would have a particular impact on scientists, who rely on unhampered exchange of materials, methods, and information. |
 | | It should be clear from her account that the conference was not aimed at "denouncing” academic boycotts (as Yudkin asserts), but at discussing the pros and cons of the AAUP position, with an eye not to changing it, but to hearing from the critics and to clarifying the nature of the debate. |
| www.aaup.org /AAUP/pubsres/academe/2006/SO/LTE/LettersAcademicBoycotts.htm (961 words) |
|